top of page

Embracing Kolb's Experiential Learning Cycle: A Pathway to Deeper Understanding


When I create content, I love doing brain gymnastic, using my imagination for especially the first step of Kolb’s experiential learning. It’s about creating an experience. This is how the stress management workshops I facilitate aim to create an optimum learning environment. It begins with just a few minutes of somatic practices, some gentle music in the background, supporting the nervous system to be receptive first, a preparation for the learning environment. Then, the rest of the workshop is actually about unpacking ‘the why’ of these practices, talking about the universal stress response, discovering the personal stress fingerprints, and self-care and self-compassion.





In the realm of adult education, Kolb's Experiential Learning Cycle offers a powerful framework for fostering profound and meaningful learning experiences. But what makes this model so effective, and what are its limitations?


Concrete Experience: Learning begins with the actual experience. It's about immersing oneself in a new activity or situation. Whether it’s a hands-on project, a simulation, or a real-world task, the key is to engage learners directly in the experience.


Reflective Observation: Following the experience, reflection is crucial. Learners step back and review what happened. This phase involves contemplating the experience, considering different perspectives, and understanding the outcomes. Reflection helps in identifying patterns and drawing meaningful insights.


Abstract Conceptualization: After reflecting, learners move on to conceptualize the experience. This involves forming theories, drawing conclusions, and creating generalizations. It’s about connecting the dots and understanding the underlying principles that can be applied to future situations.


Active Experimentation: The cycle concludes with experimentation. Learners apply their new knowledge and theories to new experiences. This phase is about testing ideas in practice, refining skills, and enhancing understanding through trial and error.

Kolb’s cycle emphasizes that learning is a continuous process grounded in experience. It’s dynamic and cyclical, encouraging learners to continuously evolve and adapt. By engaging in all four phases, learners can deepen their understanding and enhance their skills more effectively.

However, Kolb’s model is not without its critiques:


  1. Over-simplification of Learning Processes: The model may oversimplify the complex nature of learning, which is not always a neat, linear process.

  2. Cultural Bias: It reflects Western educational values and may not be applicable across different cultural contexts, especially those that prioritize group learning over individual reflection.

  3. Learning Style Validity: The concept of learning styles, closely tied to Kolb’s model, has faced scrutiny regarding its effectiveness and empirical support.

  4. Neglect of Emotional and Social Aspects: The model primarily focuses on cognitive processes, potentially overlooking the emotional and social dimensions of learning.

  5. Assumption of Sequential Stages: The model assumes a sequential progression through stages, which may not reflect the more chaotic and non-linear nature of real-world learning.

  6. Generalization Across Disciplines: It may be too general and not adequately address the specific needs of different disciplines or types of learning.


Despite these criticisms, Kolb's model remains a foundational tool in education, offering a structured approach to experiential learning. It empowers learners to take charge of their education, leading to more impactful and lasting learning outcomes.


As facilitators, our role is to guide learners through each phase of this cycle. We need to create opportunities for concrete experiences, foster reflective discussions, help conceptualize learning, and encourage active experimentation.


In my work, I’ve seen firsthand how Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle transforms learning from passive consumption to active engagement. I pay attention to include experiences and reflections in my workshops like grounding practices i explained above.


How do you incorporate experiential learning in your practice? Have you utilized Kolb’s model?

Share your experiences and thoughts in the comments!


1 view0 comments

Commentaires


bottom of page